Nicholas Hall, MAPP, is the founder and Principal of Greenwich Academic Coaching, a private academic coaching and tutoring company. He has taught at the collegiate level and teaches courses in well-being and positive psychology in Fairfield County, CT and Westchester county, NY. His research interests focus on work and satisfaction.
Nicholas writes on the 6th of each month, and his past articles are here.
There have been psychologists in the past that have attempted to describe a skill resembling emotional intelligence. None have gone so far and defined so well the concept of EI (”emotional intelligence”) as has Peter Salovey, professor of psychology at Yale University, and his colleagues. Salovey, Caruso, and Mayer (2004) “believe that there is an intelligence involving the processing of affectively charged information.” What do these researchers mean by “affectively” charged? They are referring to information that is tinted by affect, by emotion. Since the type of intelligence that Salovey and his colleagues describe involves the processing of emotional information, their definition of EI includes both the capacity to reason about emotions and the ability to use emotions to assist reasoning.
How Can We Measure EI?
There are several tests for what is broadly called emotional intelligence. The three well-known scales are the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory, the Emotional Intelligence Scale, and the MSCEIT (Salovey et. al., 2004). The MSCEIT, compared to the other tests, is the one that has the least amount of overlap with other psychological constructs and analytic intelligence, showing it to be a significantly separable and unique construct according to current psychology. (FYI, psychological constructs can include personality, such as the Big Five of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism). The MSCEIT is made up of eight task groups, two for each branch of emotional intelligence as defined by Salovey and Mayer (1990). The four branches of EI represent a hierarchy of abilities:
- Perceiving emotion
- Using emotions to facilitate thought
- Understanding emotions
- Managing emotions
The MSCEIT is not a self-report measure; it puts you through a set of tasks that demonstrates your skill. Examples of tasks are:
- Identifying emotions in faces,
- Identifying which emotions would best facilitate a type of thinking, and
- Identifying which emotion would be created by blending two distinct emotions.
How Do Positive Psychology and EI Differ, and How Are They the Same?
Positive psychology is a sub-field of psychology that, as Chris Peterson puts it, “seriously examines that which makes life worth living.” In general terms, it is the study of successful and happy individuals and organizations. Such topics of study include strengths of character and virtue, personal meaning in the workplace, and how to build these things into our lives and organizations. These topics surely impact our emotions, even when the topic is not our positive mood or emotion itself. Success elicits particular emotions, usually positive, and particular emotions (usually positive) can elicit higher performance. Character and virtues are not about emotions necessarily. They are about pragmatic and moral attitudes and behaviors that can help facilitate success. And thriving organizations typically are built through action and group processes that are attached to group performance, not group ethos.
Emotional intelligence on the other hand is all about the internal emotional awareness of the individual. As studied and defined by Salovey, Mayer, and Caruso (2004), emotional intelligence includes four branches of “abilities.” Can people perceive their emotions? Can they facilitate specific thoughts through the use of their emotions? Do they understand their emotions and relationships among them? Can they manage their emotions, and emotions within relationships with others?
What these two fields have in common is the broad study of emotions. At the same time, positive psychology isn’t limited to emotions, and within emotions, positive psychology mostly limits itself to the study of positive emotions. (Positive psychology does not study jealousy and depression, for example). So there is overlap.
In my next article, I ask where do Positive Psychology and EI overlap?
————
References:
Salovey, P., Caruso, D., & Mayer, J. D. (2004) Emotional intelligence in practice. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.) Positive psychology in practice (pp. 447-463). Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9,185-211.
- Where Positive Psychology and Emotional Intelligence Overlap by Nicholas Hall (11-10-07)
- Passages and Positive Psychology by Aren Cohen (11-12-07)
- NEWS NOW: Happiness and Health / Emotional Intelligence and Work by Editor S.M. (1-3-08)
- Positive Emotions come alive at PPND - the first Image Map by Editor S.M. (6-4-08)
- Did the earth move for you? The importance of frequency and intensity of emotion. by Bridget Grenville-Cleave (9-26-08)
[…] Where Positive Psychology and Emotional Intelligence Overlap By Nicholas Hall Positive Psychology News Daily, NY (Editor S.M.) - November 10, 2007, 11:04 pmPositive psychology and EI (“emotional intelligence”) have differing domains of research, though luckily I believe they can contribute to one another. For reference, here are the four branches of EI referenced in my earlier article on emotional intelligence. […]
[…] read more here No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> […]
[…] So, why do I mention these life stages here? I cannot help but wonder how positive psychology impacts people in different life stages. Surely there are theories of positive psychology that hold true for all life stages, but perhaps they manifest themselves differently at different times in life. While it seems likely that Barbara Fredrickson’s (1998) Broaden and Build theory, the practice of gratitude (Emmons, 2007) and the process of visioning (King, 2001) holds true at all stages of life, perhaps Barry Schwartz’s (2004) theory of “Maximizers and Satisfiers” changes over stages of life development. As we get older, are we more willing to satisfice on certain decisions? As we get older, does our ability to monitor our emotional intelligence, as described by Salovey, Caruso, and Mayer (2004) (and highlighted in this article) change? […]
[…] 為什麼我要提及這些人生階段呢?因為我不斷在思考正面心理學如何影響身在不同階段的我們。正面心理學無疑有許多理論可以應用在所有人生階段上,但或者它們在人生不同的時候所表達的都有所不同。不少理論如拓延和建構理論(Broaden and Build theory) (Barbara Fredrickson, 1998),感恩的實踐(the practice of gratitude )(Emmons, 2007)以及洞察力的過程(the process of visioning)(King, 2001)都適用於所有人生階段,又或如許Barry Schwartz (2004)的“精算大師與滿足的人”理論(theory of Maximizers and Satisfiers)會隨著人生階段發展而改變。當我們年紀大了,我們會更願意滿足於某些決定嗎?當我們老了,我們控制情緒的能力會如Salovey, Caruso, & Mayer (2004)所言改變嗎(可參閱此篇文章)? […]