<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does TV Make Us Happy?</title>
	<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350</link>
	<description>Positive Psychology News Daily - Daily boost of research-based happiness.  Authored by University of Pennsylvania graduates of the Master of Applied Positive Psychology program (MAPP).</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dustin</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-22369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-22369</guid>
		<description>Alex,

Estoy de acuerdo. La tele nos engana con imagenes falsos robandonos de la vida tan preciosa. Para ser mas preciso, malgastamos aqui en EEUU casi 4.5 horas al dia. Me imagino los pasatiempos en cuales no participo debido a mirar programas. Quizas el optimista diga --Al menos que la calidad de shows es altisima!-- Descupeme el sarcasmo.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>Estoy de acuerdo. La tele nos engana con imagenes falsos robandonos de la vida tan preciosa. Para ser mas preciso, malgastamos aqui en EEUU casi 4.5 horas al dia. Me imagino los pasatiempos en cuales no participo debido a mirar programas. Quizas el optimista diga &#8211;Al menos que la calidad de shows es altisima!&#8211; Descupeme el sarcasmo.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-22164</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-22164</guid>
		<description>la television no es mas importante que la puerta por la que sales todos los dias al mundo, en el cual se reproducen escenas que precisamente no son muy agradables. Lo que importa es la educacion con la cual vemos esta television y en definitiva lo que importa somos nosotros, las personas, que somos racionales y no estamos aprovechando este don. Gracias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>la television no es mas importante que la puerta por la que sales todos los dias al mundo, en el cual se reproducen escenas que precisamente no son muy agradables. Lo que importa es la educacion con la cual vemos esta television y en definitiva lo que importa somos nosotros, las personas, que somos racionales y no estamos aprovechando este don. Gracias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie Milner</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-6658</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie Milner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-6658</guid>
		<description>Kathryn, Frey acknowledges this is a problem with his research - it doesn't distinguish between watching TV as a primary, secondary or tertiary activity (i.e. TV on in the background while cooking and chatting to your husband). Research on this would definitely be useful - my suspicion is that this would be less of an issue, but that even this would not be ideal, e.g. because it limits the attention you give to your husband, which could damage the relationship in the long-term, and of course this kind of TV viewing makes our lives less 'mindful'.
Best wishes,
Rosie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn, Frey acknowledges this is a problem with his research - it doesn&#8217;t distinguish between watching TV as a primary, secondary or tertiary activity (i.e. TV on in the background while cooking and chatting to your husband). Research on this would definitely be useful - my suspicion is that this would be less of an issue, but that even this would not be ideal, e.g. because it limits the attention you give to your husband, which could damage the relationship in the long-term, and of course this kind of TV viewing makes our lives less &#8216;mindful&#8217;.<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Rosie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Britton</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5758</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5758</guid>
		<description>Rosie,
I wonder how many of the hours counted are televisions left on in the background while people go about other activities?  I think of visits to family members who keep the tube turned on continuously because the noise is soothing to them.  I find it very distracting during the visit -- the TV screen is an eye magnet for me and I feel rather rude.  But I've observed that they don't seem to pay it any mind.  

I just got back from a 3.5 week visit to downtown Seattle where we kept the windows open.  So I've just swapped the ever-present traffic rumble and sirens for tree frogs and cicadas as my evening background noise.  After getting used to them, I don't pay them much mind -- unless I'm specifically thinking about listening.  I wonder if TV works the same way in many lives.

Just curious.
Kathryn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosie,<br />
I wonder how many of the hours counted are televisions left on in the background while people go about other activities?  I think of visits to family members who keep the tube turned on continuously because the noise is soothing to them.  I find it very distracting during the visit &#8212; the TV screen is an eye magnet for me and I feel rather rude.  But I&#8217;ve observed that they don&#8217;t seem to pay it any mind.  </p>
<p>I just got back from a 3.5 week visit to downtown Seattle where we kept the windows open.  So I&#8217;ve just swapped the ever-present traffic rumble and sirens for tree frogs and cicadas as my evening background noise.  After getting used to them, I don&#8217;t pay them much mind &#8212; unless I&#8217;m specifically thinking about listening.  I wonder if TV works the same way in many lives.</p>
<p>Just curious.<br />
Kathryn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dustin</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5708</guid>
		<description>Rosie,

Excellent response! I love it when we get to play with ideas and find common ground.  I'm glad you newcomers are adding your distinctive voices to the conversation b/c it really does promote all kinds of new thinking and possibilities.

Positive emotions generally produce positive results, so why wouldn't watching, let's say a comedy show like Whose Line is It Anyway? if it pumps up your pleasure and maybe you exercise appreciation of excellence while watching it boost your results in life?

I think the key bit is watching too much and too low quality shows, maybe that's the third variable, the marionetteer behind the TV problem.  Relying on TV to provide you with a life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosie,</p>
<p>Excellent response! I love it when we get to play with ideas and find common ground.  I&#8217;m glad you newcomers are adding your distinctive voices to the conversation b/c it really does promote all kinds of new thinking and possibilities.</p>
<p>Positive emotions generally produce positive results, so why wouldn&#8217;t watching, let&#8217;s say a comedy show like Whose Line is It Anyway? if it pumps up your pleasure and maybe you exercise appreciation of excellence while watching it boost your results in life?</p>
<p>I think the key bit is watching too much and too low quality shows, maybe that&#8217;s the third variable, the marionetteer behind the TV problem.  Relying on TV to provide you with a life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie Milner</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5706</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie Milner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5706</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments everyone. 

When it comes to how much TV is too much, Frey found that  people who watch less than 30 minutes of TV per day are happier than those who watch more than 30 minutes - and the major negative impacts are for those who watch over 2.5 hours per day.  

I'm not aware of research which has looked at the happiness effects of watching different types of TV content. I suspect this could be important, though - as well as the effects I describe above, the different messages received from different shows may well have an impact on wellbeing. Public service broadcasters such as the BBC should be funding this research in my opinion!

Lastly, Jeff I agree with you about junk flow. I think there's a tendency among some researchers to regard all positive experiences as flow, so that less challenging experiences are dismissed as 'junk flow'. I see flow as just one positive experience - meditation and relaxation are others. We all need to relax sometimes - but I think a full life would involve both challenge and relaxation - and  if you're spending 2.5 hours per day watching TV, that might crowd out opportunities for challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments everyone. </p>
<p>When it comes to how much TV is too much, Frey found that  people who watch less than 30 minutes of TV per day are happier than those who watch more than 30 minutes - and the major negative impacts are for those who watch over 2.5 hours per day.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not aware of research which has looked at the happiness effects of watching different types of TV content. I suspect this could be important, though - as well as the effects I describe above, the different messages received from different shows may well have an impact on wellbeing. Public service broadcasters such as the BBC should be funding this research in my opinion!</p>
<p>Lastly, Jeff I agree with you about junk flow. I think there&#8217;s a tendency among some researchers to regard all positive experiences as flow, so that less challenging experiences are dismissed as &#8216;junk flow&#8217;. I see flow as just one positive experience - meditation and relaxation are others. We all need to relax sometimes - but I think a full life would involve both challenge and relaxation - and  if you&#8217;re spending 2.5 hours per day watching TV, that might crowd out opportunities for challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Khan</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5669</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5669</guid>
		<description>I would add that watching television news makes it even worse, especially the sense that the world is a more dangerous place. 

Television doesn't make us happy, that's for sure. And although most people must know that, we watch anyway. Partly because of the immediate gratification, as you say, but also partly because these television producers do everything they can to keep us watching, even against our will. If that means teasing us, they'll tease. If it means horrifying us, they'll horrify. And if they don't, someone else will. They're in stiff competition for our attention.

To live a good life, each of us has to apply the self-discipline to turn the thing off more often. Good post, Rosie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add that watching television news makes it even worse, especially the sense that the world is a more dangerous place. </p>
<p>Television doesn&#8217;t make us happy, that&#8217;s for sure. And although most people must know that, we watch anyway. Partly because of the immediate gratification, as you say, but also partly because these television producers do everything they can to keep us watching, even against our will. If that means teasing us, they&#8217;ll tease. If it means horrifying us, they&#8217;ll horrify. And if they don&#8217;t, someone else will. They&#8217;re in stiff competition for our attention.</p>
<p>To live a good life, each of us has to apply the self-discipline to turn the thing off more often. Good post, Rosie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5659</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5659</guid>
		<description>Hi and Welcome Rosie!

Thanks to the advances of modern technology like TiVO and DVR, I've found ways to optimize the little bit of pleasure I get from watching the tube. I record only the shows I like to watch, and spend about 45 minutes each night watching just those shows.  I fast forward through all of the commercials (not to mention to fear-inducing local news flashes!).  I've found this to be a guilt-free way to indulge in my favorite shows, while still leaving plenty of time in my night to read and write, cook dinner, spend time with friends, and relax.

Thanks for the great post!

Gloria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and Welcome Rosie!</p>
<p>Thanks to the advances of modern technology like TiVO and DVR, I&#8217;ve found ways to optimize the little bit of pleasure I get from watching the tube. I record only the shows I like to watch, and spend about 45 minutes each night watching just those shows.  I fast forward through all of the commercials (not to mention to fear-inducing local news flashes!).  I&#8217;ve found this to be a guilt-free way to indulge in my favorite shows, while still leaving plenty of time in my night to read and write, cook dinner, spend time with friends, and relax.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great post!</p>
<p>Gloria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.thehappinessblog.com</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>www.thehappinessblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>Rosie,
I really enjoyed your piece. I think that television seems to dominate our time and energy. It is sad to think that out level of well-being is so negatively affected by it. 
Great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosie,<br />
I really enjoyed your piece. I think that television seems to dominate our time and energy. It is sad to think that out level of well-being is so negatively affected by it.<br />
Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senia</title>
		<link>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Senia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pos-psych.com/news/rosie-milner/20070725350#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>WELCOME NEW WRITER ROSIE!!!   
Great to have you on board!

I really like that your article takes apart the argument against TV and breaks it into its various psychological components - it's nice to see that it's not just a general "tv is bad" but more like "here's what tv does in particular."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELCOME NEW WRITER ROSIE!!!<br />
Great to have you on board!</p>
<p>I really like that your article takes apart the argument against TV and breaks it into its various psychological components - it&#8217;s nice to see that it&#8217;s not just a general &#8220;tv is bad&#8221; but more like &#8220;here&#8217;s what tv does in particular.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
